-
Nowhera Shaikh: Defamation Suit Against Owaisi is Backed by Indisputable Grounds
New Delhi: (News Release: Mutiur Rahman Aziz) Nowhera Shaikh, the architect and national president of the All India Mahila Empowerment Party (AIMEP), underscored her allegations against Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi, repudiating any insinuation of electoral maneuvering. In a forthright declaration, Shaikh addressed the defamation litigation she instigated against the Hyderabad MP, asserting the veracity of her claims and elucidating the substantial grounds for her demand for reparations. Shaikh, who also helms the Heera Group as its managing director, initiated this civil defamation lawsuit on September 29, 2017. The litigation sought an exorbitant Rs 100 crore in damages from Owaisi, accusing him of promulgating numerous defamatory assertions against her through a newspaper medium. Despite the Lok Sabha elections having occurred three months ago, Shaikh clarified that her decision to embark on this legal journey was devoid of political underpinnings. "The concurrence of this lawsuit with the electoral season was purely coincidental. My unwavering commitment to justice and veracity remains steadfast, independent of the prevailing political milieu,” she articulated. Shaikh maintained that her lawsuit was anchored in a relentless quest for integrity. "The baseless allegations leveled against me have inflicted severe damage on both my personal reputation and the professional standing of the Heera Group,” Shaikh declared. Her pursuit, she asserted, was to set a legal precedent that underscores the gravity of defamation, regardless of the societal stature of the accused. "Defamation is a grave transgression that merits serious judicial scrutiny and intervention,” she emphasized. Reiterating her dedication to the cause of women’s empowerment, Shaikh accentuated her ongoing social initiatives. "My primary focus remains on the upliftment of women and supporting ventures that foster financial independence for women, creating what I term ‘lakhpati didis’—women who are economically self-sufficient,” she elucidated.
Shaikh categorically denied any political motivations behind her lawsuit, lamenting the unfortunate conflation of her legal battle with the electoral context. "It is regrettable that this lawsuit was perceived through the prism of the political climate. My pursuit of justice is an intensely personal endeavor, one that I would have undertaken irrespective of the electoral calendar,” she expounded. Expressing her steadfast faith in the judicial system, Shaikh asserted, "I have an unwavering belief in our judiciary’s capacity to unearth the truth and deliver a fair verdict. The legal process, despite its often protracted and arduous nature, is an essential path to vindication.” At the heart of Shaikh ‘s defamation lawsuit were the allegedly slanderous remarks made by Owaisi, which she claimed significantly damaged her reputation and that of her business conglomerate. Shaikh insisted that these defamatory statements were not only baseless but also maliciously intended to tarnish her standing in both personal and professional domains. By seeking legal redress, she aimed to demonstrate her resolve to protect her integrity and that of her enterprise. Shaikh ‘s pursuit of justice was not merely a reaction to personal affronts but a broader endeavor to uphold the principles of accountability and integrity. She maintained that the severe damages sought in the lawsuit underscored the gravity of the defamation and her determination to seek redress. This legal action, she contended, was a necessary confrontation against unfounded slander and an affirmation of her commitment to truth and justice. Through this lawsuit, Shaikh aspired to set a precedent that defamation is a serious matter warranting judicial scrutiny, irrespective of the public stature of the individuals involved. Shaikh asserted that her legal action was not merely a reactionary measure but a proactive stance against defamation, aimed at ensuring accountability and fostering a culture of respect and dignity in public discourse. The substantial damages sought highlighted the severity of the alleged defamation and her determination to seek redress. Despite claims from political adversaries that this lawsuit was a ploy to garner electoral sympathy or discredit a rival, Shaikh remained unwavering in her narrative. She viewed this legal battle as a necessary confrontation against baseless slander and an affirmation of her commitment to truth and justice. This lawsuit intertwined personal integrity, professional credibility, and the overarching theme of women’s empowerment, all of which Shaikh passionately championed. By emphasizing these themes, she reinforced her position and provided a comprehensive context for her legal action. Shaikh ‘s pursuit of justice transcended personal grievances, embodying broader principles of integrity and accountability. In her statements, Shaikh meticulously detailed the adverse impact of Owaisi’s alleged defamatory remarks, highlighting how they had impinged upon her reputation and the operational efficacy of her business. By seeking judicial redress, Shaikh aimed to reclaim her tarnished image and fortify the principles of accountability and integrity. Shaikh acknowledged that the judicial proceedings might be fraught with challenges and protracted timelines, but she remained resolute. Her faith in the judicial system’s capacity to adjudicate fairly and justly was unwavering, and she anticipated a verdict that would not only vindicate her but also set a deterrent precedent against defamatory conduct. Throughout this legal odyssey, Shaikh aspired to underscore the significance of integrity and highlight the detrimental effects of defamation, advocating for a more respectful and truthful public dialogue. Her lawsuit, she asserted, was a pivotal step toward fostering an environment where personal and professional reputations are safeguarded against unfounded and malicious attacks.
Shaikh ‘s legal battle against Asaduddin Owaisi was multifaceted, transcending mere personal grievances to embody broader themes of justice, integrity, and empowerment. By taking a firm stance against defamation, she aimed to ensure accountability and foster a culture of respect and dignity in public discourse. The substantial damages sought in the lawsuit underscored the severity of the alleged defamation and Shaikh ‘s determination to seek redress. Despite accusations from political adversaries that this lawsuit was a tactic to garner electoral sympathy or discredit a rival, Shaikh remained unwavering in her narrative. She viewed this legal battle as a necessary confrontation against baseless slander and an affirmation of her commitment to truth and justice. This lawsuit intertwined personal integrity, professional credibility, and the overarching theme of women’s empowerment, all of which Shaikh passionately championed. By emphasizing these themes, she reinforced her position and provided a comprehensive context for her legal action. Shaikh ‘s pursuit of justice transcended personal grievances, embodying broader principles of integrity and accountability. As the judicial process unfolded, Shaikh ‘s unwavering resolve and commitment to these principles remained at the forefront of her legal campaign, promising a rigorous pursuit of truth and vindication.
