Attempt to destroy Muslims, Rs 100 crore case against Owaisi
Written by ….9911853902….Matiur Rehman Aziz
Every citizen of the country has understood that Owaisi is that infamous barrister of the country whose degree has been used to weaken, break and suppress the citizens of the motherland, especially the oppressed and forced Muslims, instead of defending them. Hundreds of such cases have come to light in which Owaisi filed a case against innocent Muslims to save his city of sins from sinking and fearing the end of his existence. One of these cases is the case that Owaisi filed against a company that had been running in Hyderabad since 1998, and with the coming days, the development of this company was on a daily basis. In the case filed in 2012, Owaisi himself faced defeat and was fined Rs 100 crore in return. The defamation case became a noose around Owaisi’s (snake’s) neck. Owaisi was afraid of the popularity of the Heera Group’s interest-free business, which made his Darul Salam Bank, which earns crores of rupees annually by auctioning the jewelry of Hyderabadi mothers and sisters and other interest-based transactions. Secondly, the popularity of the All India Mahila Empowerment Party, the CEO of Heera Group, made Owaisi afraid that his dirty and double-dealing politics would be ruined. Thirdly, Heera Medical College threatened Owaisi that the most expensive hospital like Fatima Owaisi would go into loss. Therefore, due to all these compulsions and fears, Owaisi filed a case against the Heera Group and Dr. Noheer Sheikh, and as a result, Owaisi was in such a state of shock that he was left with a mouthful of dirt.
There are some characters in the country’s politics who talk about law, constitution and democracy, but when it comes to the emergence of a weak, opposing or alternative political and economic force, many serious questions arise on their behavior. The dispute between Barrister Asaduddin Owaisi and the Heera Group also raises similar questions. The question is, was it necessary to fight a legal battle against a company that had been running its business in Hyderabad since 1998? Was there really a solid legal basis behind this dispute or were business competition and political interests also among its motivations? The Heera Group was founded on the concept of interest-free business. The CEO of the company, Dr. Nowhera Sheikh, claimed to make women economically independent, provide investment opportunities in business and introduce an alternative economic system. Over time, the activities of this organization and the political popularity of Dr. Nowhera Sheikh also increased. This was the stage when the dispute between the Heera Group and Owaisi took a new turn.
In 2012, Owaisi took legal action against the Heera Group. It is important to understand the background and its consequences. If a court rejects the relevant claim or does not accept Owaisi’s position, the actual text of the decision should be made public. It is the right of every citizen to file a legal case, but the question of using this right to suppress a business entity, a political opponent or an economically emerging force is equally important. If the allegations in a case are not proven, its legal and moral consequences must be discussed. The position of an influential barrister cannot make him above judicial accountability. Three basic aspects are noteworthy in the case of the Heera Group. First: Interest-free business system. The Heera Group made its identity with the interest-free business concept. The popularity of this concept and its business impact compared to other financial institutions is a legitimate journalistic topic. However, the allegations regarding the business practices of Darussalam Bank, the auction of jewelry and income should be presented with documentary evidence. Second: The entry of Dr. Nowhera Sheikh into the political arena. Through the All India Mahila Empowerment Party, Dr. Nowhera Sheikh raised the slogan of political representation and autonomy for women. The existence and popularity of a new political party can cause political competition for any established political party. The question is whether political differences with the Hera Group also played a role in this dispute? The answer to this question should not be based on speculation but on a comparison of relevant statements, documents and events. Third: Competition in the Hera Medical College and the medical sector. The Hera Group’s medical education project should also be seen in the context of this entire dispute. Medical education and the business of hospitals is a big sector in Hyderabad. In such a situation, competition is natural with the arrival of a new institution, but competition cannot be justified in a judicial dispute.
